🚚 at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.2/5 from 109+ reviews
Vintage ✓ In Stock 🔥 Bestseller 

“Louis de Pointe du Lac” goth jewelry lot

★★★★★ 4.2 out of 5 (109 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$9.5
$15.83
Sale
✓ no-cost dispatch on this item • Limited time offer

Dark, dangerous and sparkly… what’s better than that?Bundle and preserve!

🔒
Secure Checkout
🚚
speedy delivery
↩️
easy Returns

📋 Product Description

“Louis de Pointe du Lac” goth jewelry lot

Dark, dangerous and sparkly… what’s better than that?
Bundle and keep!

This product is outstanding for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

📐 Specifications

SKU: 485746

Category: Vintage > Antiques > Jewelry

Original Price: $15.83 USD

Sale Price: $9.5 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand brand-new

🚚 dispatch & Returns

✓ gratis delivery on orders over $50

Standard fulfillment: 3-5 business days

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

Recommended For You

4.2
★★★★★
Based on 1192 reviews
MR
Mike Reynolds ✓ Verified Purchase
9 months ago · Columbus, OH
★★★★★
Outstanding quality
Personally, the “Louis de Pointe du Lac” goth jewelry lot works well enough and I’m satisfied. Works fine so far.
35 people found this helpful
BW
Brandon Wright ✓ Verified Purchase
11 months ago · Oakland, CA
★★★★☆
astonishing “Louis de Pointe du Lac” goth jewelry lot
To be fair, it works as described and it’s fine overall.
45 people found this helpful
BT
Brittany Turner ✓ Verified Purchase
4 months ago · Seattle, WA
★★★★★
So happy with this
Honestly, it performs as expected and it works for me.​
6 people found this helpful
AW
Ashley White ✓ Verified Purchase
5 months ago · Miami, FL
★★★★★
premier decision
I wouldn’t hesitate to purchase the “Louis de Pointe du Lac” goth jewelry lot again.
38 people found this helpful
CE
Christina Evans ✓ Verified Purchase 
4 months ago · Dallas, TX
★★★★★
foremost purchase ever
At first, the “Louis de Pointe du Lac” goth jewelry lot feels okay which is good enough.
6 people found this helpful