🚚 at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.2/5 from 296+ reviews
Men βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Vintage Boy Scouts Ring

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.2 out of 5 (296 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$50
$83.33
Sale
βœ“ no-cost dispatch on this item β€’ Limited time offer

1940s to 1950s Boy Scout ringin sterling silver. The sizing isnot exact, but it's around a size9-10.

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
speedy Shipping
↩️
straightforward Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage Boy Scouts Ring

1940s to 1950s Boy Scout ring
in sterling silver. The sizing is
not exact, but it's around a size
9-10.

This product is outstanding for anyone looking for quality Men products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 616894

Category: Men > Jewelry > Rings

Original Price: $83.33 USD

Sale Price: $50 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand latest

🚚 dispatch & Returns

βœ“ gratis dispatch on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.2
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 1157 reviews
TM
Tyler Mitchell βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Sacramento, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Worth every penny​
To be fair, the Vintage Boy Scouts Ring feels solid and it’s fine overall.
14 people found this helpful
ET
Emily Thompson βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Orlando, FL 
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
faultless in every way
To be fair, it is practical and it meets expectations.
24 people found this helpful
AH
Andrew Hall βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago Β· San Diego, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
genuinely impressed
To be fair, the Vintage Boy Scouts Ring is practical which is good enough.
21 people found this helpful
TM
Tyler Mitchell
11 months ago Β· Milwaukee, WI
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Exactly what I needed
To be fair, it is straightforward to use so it’s acceptable.
27 people found this helpful
MR
Mike Reynolds βœ“ Verified Purchase
1 week ago Β· Las Vegas, NV
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
extraordinary quality
So far, it feels okay which feels reasonable. Nothing fancy.
12 people found this helpful