🚚 at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.3/5 from 181+ reviews
Vintage βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Vintage Ice Cream Bowls

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.3 out of 5 (181 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$22
$36.67
Sale
βœ“ no-cost dispatch on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Set of (3) vintage Ice Cream Bowls. Made exclusively for The J.M. Smucker Company.

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
speedy Shipping
↩️
straightforward Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage Ice Cream Bowls

Set of (3) vintage Ice Cream Bowls. Made exclusively for The J.M. Smucker Company.

This product is outstanding for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 752672

Category: Vintage > Houseware > Bowls

Original Price: $36.67 USD

Sale Price: $22 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand latest

🚚 dispatch & Returns

βœ“ gratis dispatch on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days​

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.3
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 7766 reviews
AD
Amanda Davis
3 months ago Β· Albuquerque, NM
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
incredibly satisfied
After assorted use, the Vintage Ice Cream Bowls does its job which is good enough.​
27 people found this helpful
JW
Jennifer Wilson
6 months ago Β· St. Louis, MO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
splendid investment
For the price, the Vintage Ice Cream Bowls is practical and it’s fine overall. Nothing fancy.
26 people found this helpful
JB
Justin Baker βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Raleigh, NC
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Outstanding!
Personally, it works as described which is good enough.
15 people found this helpful
RS
Rachel Scott βœ“ Verified Purchase
12 months ago Β· Orlando, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Totally worth it
No issues so far with the Vintage Ice Cream Bowls.
17 people found this helpful
JB
Justin Baker βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· Kansas City, MO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
treasure this Vintage Ice Cream Bowls!
At first, the Vintage Ice Cream Bowls works well enough which is good enough.
11 people found this helpful