🚚 at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.5/5 from 960+ reviews
Vintage βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Elegance Spring Set

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.5 out of 5 (960 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$50
$83.33
Sale
βœ“ no-cost dispatch on this item β€’ Limited time offer

NewEleganceIncludes Butter DishSugar & Creamer SetColorful flowers and butterflies

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
speedy delivery
↩️
easy Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Elegance Spring Set

recent
Elegance
Includes Butter Dish
Sugar & Creamer Set

Colorful flowers and butterflies​

This product is outstanding for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 763386

Category: Vintage > Serving Pieces > Butter Dishes

Original Price: $83.33 USD

Sale Price: $50 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand brand-new

🚚 dispatch & Returns

βœ“ gratis delivery on orders over $50

Standard fulfillment: 3-5 business days

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.5
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 2084 reviews

CL
Christopher Lee βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Detroit, MI
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
fancy it!
The Elegance Spring Set meets my expectations well.
44 people found this helpful
RM
Robert Martinez βœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago Β· Colorado Springs, CO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
fabulous investment
After a few days, it works fine so it’s acceptable. Packaging was easy.
35 people found this helpful
NP
Nathan Phillips βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Phoenix, AZ
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Brilliant Elegance Spring Set
Solid performance from the Elegance Spring Set.
21 people found this helpful
NP
Nathan Phillips βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Milwaukee, WI
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
So happy with this
Personally, the Elegance Spring Set feels okay and it’s fine overall. Arrived on time.
30 people found this helpful
CE
Christina Evans
5 months ago Β· Detroit, MI
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Outstanding!
After assorted use, the Elegance Spring Set works well enough which is good enough.
15 people found this helpful