๐Ÿšš at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.2/5 from 436+ reviews
Men โœ“ In Stock ๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller

70s-80s Levi's 517, deep indigo!

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜… 4.2 out of 5 (436 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$250.4
$417.33
Sale
โœ“ no-cost dispatch on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

There is no product description.

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
speedy Shipping
โ†ฉ๏ธ
straightforward Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

70s-80s Levi's 517, deep indigo!

There is no product description.

This product is outstanding for anyone looking for quality Men products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 784191

Category: Men > Jeans > Boot Cut

Original Price: $417.33 USD

Sale Price: $250.4 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand latest

๐Ÿšš dispatch & Returns

โœ“ gratis dispatch on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.2
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 3303 reviews
RS
Rachel Scott โœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago ยท San Jose, CA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Couldn't be happier​
At first, the 70s-80s Levi's 517, deep indigo! feels solid and it works for me. No setup issues.
27 people found this helpful
DA
David Anderson โœ“ Verified Purchase
1 month ago ยท Omaha, NE
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Outstanding!
From my experience, the 70s-80s Levi's 517, deep indigo! feels okay and Iโ€™m satisfied.
30 people found this helpful
JA
Joshua Allen โœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago ยท Honolulu, HI
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
fabulous value for money
Honestly, the 70s-80s Levi's 517, deep indigo! fits my needs so Iโ€™m okay with it. dispatch was normal.
17 people found this helpful
JB
Justin Baker
5 months ago ยท Miami, FL
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Exactly what I needed
After a few days, the 70s-80s Levi's 517, deep indigo! feels solid so no complaints.
38 people found this helpful
MW
Michelle Walker โœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago ยท Dallas, TX
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Couldn't be happier
The 70s-80s Levi's 517, deep indigo! feels okay, not economical.
33 people found this helpful