🚚 at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.8/5 from 573+ reviews
Vintage βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Vintage navajo sterling ring

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.8 out of 5 (573 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$27
$45
Sale
βœ“ no-cost dispatch on this item β€’ Limited time offer

Turquoise is quite nicely bezel set. Clean stone in fabulous shape size 6.

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
speedy delivery

↩️
easy Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Vintage navajo sterling ring

Turquoise is quite nicely bezel set. Clean stone in magnificent shape size 6.

This product is outstanding for anyone looking for quality Vintage products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 825439

Category: Vintage > Jewelry > Rings

Original Price: $45 USD

Sale Price: $27 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand brand-new

🚚 dispatch & Returns

βœ“ gratis delivery on orders over $50

Standard fulfillment: 3-5 business days

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.8
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 9983 reviews
RM
Robert Martinez βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Tampa, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
fancy this Vintage navajo sterling ring!
At first, the Vintage navajo sterling ring works well enough so it’s acceptable. Arrived on time.
13 people found this helpful
JB
Justin Baker βœ“ Verified Purchase
3 months ago Β· San Diego, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Absolutely fancy it
The Vintage navajo sterling ring looks similar to the listing photos.
15 people found this helpful
DC
Daniel Clark βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Portland, OR
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
Super happy
Nice build quality Vintage navajo sterling ring.
14 people found this helpful
ET
Emily Thompson βœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago Β· Cincinnati, OH
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
top decision
The Vintage navajo sterling ring is straightforward to use and works perfectly.
22 people found this helpful
RM
Robert Martinez βœ“ Verified Purchase
6 months ago Β· Houston, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
terrific quality
The Vintage navajo sterling ring works the way I expected it to.
31 people found this helpful