🚚 at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.9/5 from 135+ reviews
Men ✓ In Stock 🔥 Bestseller

Dexter Men's retro Bowling Shoes

★★★★★ 4.9 out of 5 (135 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$44.22​
$73.7
Sale
✓ no-cost dispatch on this item • Limited time offer

DEX-LITE EVA outsoleSoft solid man-made upperDefined rubber horseshoe heelImproved slide rite microfiber sole on both shoes

🔒
Secure Checkout
🚚
expedient Shipping
↩️
straightforward Returns

📋 Product Description

Dexter Men's iconic Bowling Shoes

  • DEX-LITE EVA outsole
  • gentle rugged man-made upper
  • Defined rubber horseshoe heel
  • Improved slide rite microfiber sole on both shoes


This product is impeccable for anyone looking for quality Men products.

📐 Specifications

SKU: 1011903

Category: Men > SHOES > Athletic

Original Price: $73.7 USD

Sale Price: $44.22 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand brand-new

🚚 fulfillment & Returns

✓ gratis dispatch on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days

Express transport: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

Recommended For You

4.9
★★★★★
Based on 4601 reviews

SM
Sarah Miller ✓ Verified Purchase
3 months ago · San Diego, CA
★★★★★
Outstanding!
the Dexter Men's iconic Bowling Shoes works as described and I don’t regret it. Arrived on time.
8 people found this helpful
RM
Robert Martinez ✓ Verified Purchase
2 months ago · Albuquerque, NM
★★★★☆
certainly impressed
Honestly, the Dexter Men's timeless Bowling Shoes is practical so I’m okay with it.
47 people found this helpful
SL​
Stephanie Lewis ✓ Verified Purchase
8 months ago · Los Angeles, CA
★★★★★
Worth every penny
The Dexter Men's retro Bowling Shoes has a nice finish.
2 people found this helpful
JD
John Davidson
7 months ago · Nashville, TN
★★★★★
Impressed!
Solid Dexter Men's retro Bowling Shoes. Does its job.
36 people found this helpful
LJ
Lisa Johnson
10 months ago · Honolulu, HI
★★★★★
Super happy
At first, the Dexter Men's vintage Bowling Shoes feels solid and it works for me.
48 people found this helpful