🚚 at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.1/5 from 363+ reviews
Men βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller

Levi's 559 W34 L30

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.1 out of 5 (363 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$34.18
$56.97
Sale
βœ“ no-cost dispatch on this item β€’ Limited time offer

This is a pair of vintage Levi's 559 jeans.They are characterized by a slightly wider, straight-leg silhouette.

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
speedy Shipping
↩️
straightforward Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Levi's 559 W34 L30

This is a pair of vintage Levi's 559 jeans.
They are characterized by a slightly wider, straight-leg silhouette.

This product is outstanding for anyone looking for quality Men products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 1799417

Category: Men > Jeans > Other

Original Price: $56.97 USD

Sale Price: $34.18 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand latest

🚚 dispatch & Returns

βœ“ gratis dispatch on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days

Express fulfillment: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.1
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 9097 reviews
DC
Daniel Clark βœ“ Verified Purchase
7 months ago Β· Chicago, IL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Exceeded expectations​
The Levi's 559 W34 L30 arrived fine.
6 people found this helpful
AW
Ashley White βœ“ Verified Purchase
10 months ago Β· Fresno, CA 
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
A+ quality
In daily use, the Levi's 559 W34 L30 feels okay and I don’t regret it.
5 people found this helpful
JA
Joshua Allen βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Boston, MA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
fancy this Levi's 559 W34 L30!
In daily use, the Levi's 559 W34 L30 feels okay so it’s acceptable.
16 people found this helpful
JB
Justin Baker
1 month ago Β· Tampa, FL
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Absolutely superb
From my experience, the Levi's 559 W34 L30 is straightforward to use so no complaints.
31 people found this helpful
HP
Heather Perez βœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago Β· Houston, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
magnificent product
the Levi's 559 W34 L30 works well enough which is good enough.
48 people found this helpful