๐Ÿšš at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | โญ 4.4/5 from 990+ reviews
Women โœ“ In Stock ๐Ÿ”ฅ Bestseller

PRADA Vintage Backpack

โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜… 4.4 out of 5 (990 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$163.36​
$272.27
Sale
โœ“ no-cost dispatch on this item โ€ข Limited time offer

Purchased from a vintage shop.Please see the photos for any stains or imperfections.

๐Ÿ”’
Secure Checkout
๐Ÿšš
immediate Shipping
โ†ฉ๏ธ
straightforward Returns

๐Ÿ“‹ Product Description

PRADA Vintage Backpack

Purchased from a vintage explore.
Please see the photos for any stains or imperfections.

This product is superb for anyone looking for quality Women products.

๐Ÿ“ Specifications

SKU: 1936545

Category: Women > Women's Handbags > Backpacks

Original Price: $272.27 USD

Sale Price: $163.36 USD

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand brand-new

๐Ÿšš fulfillment & Returns

โœ“ gratis dispatch on orders over $50

Standard transport: 3-5 business days

Express transport: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

โญ Recommended For You

4.4
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
Based on 4239 reviews

AH
Andrew Hall โœ“ Verified Purchase
5 months ago ยท Nashville, TN
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
truly impressed
The PRADA Vintage Backpack is lightweight and effortless to handle.
4 people found this helpful
KG
Kevin Green
1 day ago ยท San Diego, CA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
cherish love love!
I think the PRADA Vintage Backpack is fair for the price.
26 people found this helpful
WG
William Garcia โœ“ Verified Purchase​
4 months ago ยท Sacramento, CA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
ideal in every way
Nice value product PRADA Vintage Backpack.
44 people found this helpful
JW
Jennifer Wilson โœ“ Verified Purchase
11 months ago ยท Virginia Beach, VA
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
flawless in every way
The PRADA Vintage Backpack feels stable when in use.
50 people found this helpful
CL
Christopher Lee โœ“ Verified Purchase
2 months ago ยท Portland, OR
โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…โ˜…
genuinely impressed
To be fair, the PRADA Vintage Backpack does its job so no complaints.
45 people found this helpful