🚚 at no charge SHIPPING on orders over $50 | ⭐ 4.5/5 from 625+ reviews
Women βœ“ In Stock πŸ”₯ Bestseller 

Wide Legged Jeans

β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜… 4.5 out of 5 (625 reviews)
Special Offer Price
$18
$30
Sale
βœ“ no-cost dispatch on this item β€’ Limited time offer

A little baggy, long, wide legged, ripped jeans, not damaged merely needs to be ironed.

πŸ”’
Secure Checkout
🚚
speedy delivery
↩️
easy Returns

πŸ“‹ Product Description

Wide Legged Jeans

A little baggy, long, wide legged, ripped jeans, not damaged simply needs to be ironed.

This product is outstanding for anyone looking for quality Women products.

πŸ“ Specifications

SKU: 2404933

Category: Women > Jeans > Wide-Leg

Original Price: $30 USD

Sale Price: $18 USD​

Availability: In Stock

Condition: Brand brand-new

🚚 dispatch & Returns

βœ“ gratis delivery on orders over $50

Standard fulfillment: 3-5 business days

Express shipping: 1-2 business days (+$9.99)

30-Day Returns: Not satisfied? Return within 30 days for a full refund.

⭐ Recommended For You

4.5
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Based on 8136 reviews
AR
Aaron Roberts βœ“ Verified Purchase
9 months ago Β· Raleigh, NC
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Outstanding quality
From my experience, the Wide Legged Jeans feels okay and it’s fine overall.
29 people found this helpful
SM
Sarah Miller βœ“ Verified Purchase
8 months ago Β· Austin, TX
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
splendid choice
For the price, the Wide Legged Jeans works fine so it’s acceptable.
13 people found this helpful
AD
Amanda Davis βœ“ Verified Purchase
12 months ago Β· Denver, CO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Totally worth it
For the price, the Wide Legged Jeans works well enough and I don’t regret it.​
19 people found this helpful
JM
Jessica Moore βœ“ Verified Purchase
4 months ago Β· Denver, CO
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜†
terrific quality
So far, it performs as expected which feels reasonable.
16 people found this helpful
CE
Christina Evans βœ“ Verified Purchase 
2 months ago Β· Fresno, CA
β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…β˜…
Absolutely outstanding
After certain use, the Wide Legged Jeans works as described which is good enough.
41 people found this helpful